|
Metabolism & Toxicology Studies
Metabolic and Toxicology studies look at the passage of a drug or chemical into and through the body. They range from routine safety screening for workers potentially at risk to chemicals through to pharmaceutical drug safety testing and drug prescription compliance and monitoring in the clinical environment. Genevac systems provide an invaluable tool to researchers in these environments, providing fast, safe evaporative sample preparation free from artefact, contamination and sample loss.
Applications range from the relatively simple concentration or drying of solvent extracts from tissue samples to qualitatively analyse for the presence of a drug. Two studies using a miVac concentrator focus on this work:
More complex metabolic studies utilise labelled drug molecules which are fed to subjects. Samples are taken, extracted and separated via HPLC. Multiple samples are often collected in scintillant containing microtitre plates, such as the LumaPlate. These must be carefully dried before analysis via a luminescence reader such as a TopCount. If the plates are crudely dried the labelled molecule does not come into intimate contact with the scintillant providing a false reading. The Genevac EZ-2 and DD-4X have been shown to be excellent for this purpose.
Customers working with larger volumes have shown that SampleGenie is a useful tool to help automate their sample transfer process without adverse effect on sample recovery.
Useful Papers:
-
Increasing Metabolite Recoveries in ADMET Studies - Dr Sophie Mcdougall, Sanofi Aventis Studies showed that by using a Genevac HT-4 evaporator and Luma plates can increase the sensitivity and hence the recoveries as the extra gravitational force applied helps the sample mixture to dry as a tight pellet at the bottom of the well.
-
-
-
Useful Links:
-
-
In Vitro Metabolism and Covalent Binding of Enol-Carboxamide Derivatives and Anti-Inflammatory Agents Sudoxicam and Meloxicam: Insights into the Hepatotoxicity of Sudoxicam Obach et al. published in Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2008, 21 (9), pp 1890–1899
-
-
-
|